The Los Angeles Community College District considers solar+storage for a downtown office
In March 2020, the Clean Coalition was contracted by the Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) to conduct a feasibility assessment. The assessment identified emergency power needs for critical loads and various backup power solutions, including a Solar Microgrid, at the LACCD Educational Services Center (ESC), a high-rise building in downtown Los Angeles.
We assessed the feasibility of a Solar Microgrid compared to the ESC’s existing emergency backup power system, which is based on a polluting diesel generator. A Solar Microgrid is a microgrid featuring solar+storage, as well as microgrid controls that allow it to island from the larger electric grid during outages. As a leader in sustainability, the LACCD would like to replace their diesel generator with a Solar Microgrid system.
The Clean Coalition is currently working on the feasibility assessment, which we expect to complete by the end of June 2020.
Overcoming unique challenges
In our preliminary analysis, the Clean Coalition came up with recommendations to address the following challenges.
Siting
The ESC is housed in an all-electric nine-story building in a dense urban location. A multi-tiered roof and shading from nearby buildings severely limit the potential for roof-mounted solar at the site.
The solution to these site constraints is to install a solar PV canopy 30 feet above the existing building, similar to solar canopies that are typically found atop large commercial parking garages or parking lots.
Financing
Because the LACCD is a tax-exempt public agency, it is unable to take advantage of the investment tax credit (ITC) for solar and energy storage. To benefit from the ITC, the LACCD would have to enter into a power purchase agreement (PPA) with a third-party system owner, which the LACCD is prohibited from doing. Since the LACCD is unable to pursue a PPA, it will have to purchase the solar+storage.
In addition, as a customer of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), the site isn’t eligible for California’s Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) incentive for energy storage, which is available only to customers of an investor-owned utility (IOU).
These and other factors could limit the cost-effectiveness of a Solar Microgrid at the ESC site. However, accounting for the project’s Value of Resilience (VOR) makes the economics much more favorable (see more on this below).
Code requirements
Current code requirements disallow replacing the existing diesel generator with solar+storage.
Diesel generators, in addition to being highly polluting, are not resilient. Most diesel generators have only enough fuel on hand for two days, and during a disaster that fuel may be difficult, or impossible, to replenish.
However, if the diesel generator needs to remain in place, its use can be minimized as a backup to the renewables-driven backup power provided by a Solar Microgrid. On most days, there is enough sun to partially charge a battery; even on cloudy days, the system will generate some solar energy. If a power outage occurs during a time of minimal solar generation — perhaps because of heavy rain — then the diesel generator can be used to fill the battery. This happens only when the battery hits a minimum state of charge, and even then, only at optimum nameplate capacity until the battery is fully charged.
While diesel generators have limited onsite fuel supply, solar panels generate at least some electricity every day. The result is that the solar+storage provides indefinite renewables-driven resilience for the most critical electric loads.
Valuing resilience
Despite the challenges to deploying a Solar Microgrid at the ESC, the benefits to the LACCD and the surrounding community would be significant — in particular, the environmental and resilience benefits.
Without accounting for the Value of Resilience (VOR), a solar+storage system would come at a premium to the LACCD; the preliminary figure for the levelized cost of energy with such a system is twice that of the current rate the LACCD is paying to LADWP. Accounting for the substantial VOR changes the system economics.
To arrive at a standardized VOR, the Clean Coalition has developed a method for allocating electric loads into three tiers, VOR123:
- Tier 1, usually about 10% of the total load: Mission-critical and life-sustaining loads that must be kept operational at all times, including during grid outages.
- Tier 2, usually about 15% of the total load: Priority loads that should be maintained as long as doing so does not threaten the ability to maintain Tier 1 loads.
- Tier 3, usually about 75% of the total load: Discretionary loads that can be maintained when doing so does not threaten the ability to maintain Tier 1 and Tier 2 loads.
The Clean Coalition’s analysis has found different VOR levels for each of the three load tiers, along with value ranges for most sites. Tier 1 loads generally yield a 20% adder to the pre-resilience electricity rate; Tier 2 loads yield a 7.5% adder; and Tier 3 loads, since they are by definition discretionary, have no resilience value assigned.
The Clean Coalition uses a VOR of 25% as the standard load tiering allocation for typical sites, which yields an average solar microgrid adder of about 4¢/kWh. This is approximately 25% of the ESC’s average electricity rate in 2019 of 16.1¢/kWh. As we continue to assess the VOR for the ESC, VOR adders will need to be agreed upon by the relevant stakeholders.
Assessing Solar Microgrid feasibility
To assess the feasibility of a Solar Microgrid at the ESC, the Clean Coalition:
- Conducted a thorough code review to ensure code compliance of all designs.
- Collected data on the site’s utility bills and energy usage, as well as site conditions.
- Performed in-depth assessment of the site’s critical loads, in consultation with the ESC Facilities Project Manager.
- Defined and analyzed 40 combinations of critical load design scenarios, based on: Various load requirements (for example, maintaining business continuity versus running an emergency operations center); Two outage durations and various types of outages (for example, a loss of offsite power combined with a fire); and Four different mixes of energy generation resources (combinations of solar, energy storage, and diesel generators).
- Performed detailed economic and carbon emission analyses on the most promising configurations.
- Conducted stakeholder outreach on business continuity needs within various district departments housed at the ESC.
- Created a preliminary design for the Solar Microgrid system.
The LACCD is interested in maximizing onsite energy storage for this project. In addition, there’s an exciting possibility for the LACCD to partner with LADWP on a pilot energy storage project that would provide both capacity to the utility and resilience to the LACCD. Such a pilot would provide an additional cost-sharing opportunity and potentially a revenue stream for the project.
The LACCD may be interested in conducting similar analyses for rest of their campuses. Many of the other LACCD sites might be more suited to Solar Microgrids, because they have both larger electric loads and more space for solar system siting.
Originally published at https://clean-coalition.org on June 18, 2020.
